Ah. The post is using the correct 'its'. I started doubting my grasp of grammar after I saw your comment, and after reading through Merriam-Webster's article on the usage of 'its versus it's', was ready to punch out a snarky retort about how it was _you_ who got it wrong.

Good thing I clicked on the link before all that.

Nope. The author fixed it.

http://archive.is/62FEp

Yup, that's what I meant too - I just mangled the sentence badly, sorry.

Ah, got it :-)

Am I the only one bothered by the fact the most upvoted comment is about a grammatical mistake in the title, and nothing about the self driving train and its significance in an overpopulated underdeveloped city? (Did I get "its" right?)

I believe it's based in India, so probably people who don't speak English natively.

I thought they did speak English natively in India...

Regardless, if you don't know basic English grammar you shouldn't be a writer. I'm Italian and even I can catch an error like that.

It's their offical language, along with Hindi. Many of the Indians I've known have a much better formal command of the language than many native English! Including myself.

Making a language "official" doesn't make it your native language, unfortunately.

Oh FFS.

To stay on point it's a matter of ignorance not nativity. The article is crap not because it is Indian, which is irrelevant, but because the domain is a minimal effort blog that has no place on HN.

I'm sorry but that simply isn't true. Pretending like the English literacy rate in India isn't 12% is silly and false.