Re:GitHub lost $66M in nine months of 2016
by StreamBright on Friday December 16, 2016 @04:07AM
(#13192022)
Similar to Twitter. I do not understand why the hell they get political.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:GitHub lost $66M in nine months of 2016
by pjc50 on Friday December 16, 2016 @05:58AM
(#13192397)
The mountain does not go to Mohammed, Mohammed goes to the mountain.
That is, politics is not something you can opt out of. Choosing to do or not do certain things impacts certain individuals and groups. The result is politics. It comes to you. If you operate any system by which humans can communicate, politics is inevitable.
While true, if you've heard of any of the happenings at GitHub, you know it's not that simple and that they have been aggressively political in the past.
Re:GitHub lost $66M in nine months of 2016
by SixSigma on Friday December 16, 2016 @07:14AM
(#13192722)
Twitter is very politicised though.
The ban hammer is not wielded impartially.
Re:GitHub lost $66M in nine months of 2016
by jolux on Sunday December 18, 2016 @05:26AM
(#13205218)
twitter has been the birthplace of many emancipatory political movements. How was it ever not political? Furthermore, how are they wielding the ban hammer badly these days? Banning abusive assholes like Milo for example who make the site less fun for everyone else should happen more often, not less.
actually, their are some systems that try to force political forces out of the company. see holocracy.
Re:GitHub lost $66M in nine months of 2016
by flukus on Friday December 16, 2016 @04:31AM
(#13192100)
At least with Twitter it's hopefully a wake up call for a lot of people about relying on centralized infrastructure.
Then again, Snapchat.
Re:GitHub lost $66M in nine months of 2016
by throwaway1892 on Monday December 19, 2016 @08:58AM
(#13211372)
A blog that could be relevant
http://hintjens.com/blog:111
(it's not about politics, it's about money)