Re:GitHub lost $66M in nine months of 2016
by hyperbovine on Thursday December 15, 2016 @09:51PM
(#13190700)
I don't understand this obsession with the first derivative of value. GitHub already provides loads of value. I understand they need resources to keep the lights on, but they could do that by recouping a tiny fee from their users and most everyone would be happy.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:GitHub lost $66M in nine months of 2016
by Trundle on Friday December 16, 2016 @12:55AM
(#13191359)
They're not without alternatives already though. In a changing environment to stay still is to fall behind.
Re:GitHub lost $66M in nine months of 2016
by TeMPOraL on Friday December 16, 2016 @05:18AM
(#13192256)
And to move is to risk a quick death. I wished existing brands stopped innovating so much. That's e.g. what got Pebble killed.
Doubly so when a brand reaches infrastructure level - like Github, or arguably Dropbox. Just don't screw with the product that's working well. Not breaking things isn't expensive.
Re:GitHub lost $66M in nine months of 2016
by hyperbovine on Friday December 16, 2016 @04:29AM
(#13192093)
That's not as big an issue when there are network effects -- look at Craigslist. Plus, what killer feature is bitbucket going to add at this point to make everyone want to switch? They're practically the same product. All the major innovation happened years ago.
Re:GitHub lost $66M in nine months of 2016
by rumcajz on Friday December 16, 2016 @05:36AM
(#13192317)
Clickable code view would be nice, e.g:
Re:GitHub lost $66M in nine months of 2016
by robinhood on Friday December 16, 2016 @10:13AM
(#13193767)
Thanks for the idea. This would be awesome indeed. I've created an issue on GitLab for this: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/25762
This would be wonderful.