News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:GitHub lost $66M in nine months of 2016 by sumedh on Thursday December 15, 2016 @09:27PM (#13190595)
> when someone else then creates the next image hosting site.

If I am not mistaken Imgur is doing quite well for many years now.

Re:GitHub lost $66M in nine months of 2016 by camus2 on Thursday December 15, 2016 @10:20PM (#13190809)
How is Imgur making money ?
Re:GitHub lost $66M in nine months of 2016 by sumedh on Thursday December 15, 2016 @10:34PM (#13190850)
Ads, they are making good money from the ads that they removed paid plans and gave all the features to everyone.
Re:GitHub lost $66M in nine months of 2016 by nerdponx on Thursday December 15, 2016 @11:26PM (#13191057)
Keep in mind that also have a superior product to just about every image host that came before them (other than Flickr), they are the de-facto favored image host for Reddit, and to top it off have their own social networking features with non-trivial market adoption.

With that many eyeballs on your site it's no surprise that even their subtle advertising style [1] is profitable. I'd personally much rather see sponsored posts everywhere than pandering direct marketing and spying/tracking.

[1]: http://www.imgurads.com/

Re:GitHub lost $66M in nine months of 2016 by zimpenfish on Friday December 16, 2016 @07:41AM (#13192836)
> they are the de-facto favored image host for Reddit

Not any more - https://techcrunch.com/2016/05/25/reddit-image-uploads/

Re:GitHub lost $66M in nine months of 2016 by StRoy on Friday December 16, 2016 @02:06PM (#13195805)
> Not any more

Actually that is still the case. He said "de facto" not "official". Imgur still represents the majority of image links on most subreddits.

https://www.reddit.com/domain/i.imgur.com/

r/all shows more imgur links than i.reddit: https://www.reddit.com/r/all/

Your article dates from half a year ago and they still couldn't snuff imgur out with built-in upload facilities, suffice to say, as far as the users are concerned, imgur is the defacto beloved service. People on twitter are more likely to use twitter's img upload than redditors are to use their own.

Re:GitHub lost $66M in nine months of 2016 by anonbanker on Friday December 16, 2016 @05:03AM (#13192221)
slowly being replaced with sli.mg, the way that reddit is slowly being replaced with voat.co.
Re:GitHub lost $66M in nine months of 2016 by duiker101 on Friday December 16, 2016 @06:14AM (#13192467)
So it's not?
Re:GitHub lost $66M in nine months of 2016 by sumedh on Friday December 16, 2016 @06:19AM (#13192488)
I have been hearing that about voat.co for couple of years.
Re:GitHub lost $66M in nine months of 2016 by anonbanker on Sunday December 18, 2016 @06:49PM (#13208445)
took reddit a while to replace digg as well. a few years, in fact.
Re:GitHub lost $66M in nine months of 2016 by sumedh on Sunday December 18, 2016 @07:08PM (#13208512)
People moved from digg to reddit in mass becase digg screwed up big time, as long as Reddit does not make any big screw ups, its pretty safe.
Re:GitHub lost $66M in nine months of 2016 by anonbanker on Monday December 26, 2016 @05:10PM (#13260045)
seems the spez /r/the_donald controversy has tripled voat's user base.