News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on GitHub lost $66M in nine months of 2016. Parent comment

Re:GitHub lost $66M in nine months of 2016 by matthewbauer on Thursday December 15, 2016 @06:42PM (#13189803)
GitHub has a "network" tab under "Graphs" that might provide what you're looking for.

But when people say that GitHub has better UI, they're more talking about the clean menus and intuitive UI. Some of it might just be getting used to one design over another. Although, BitBucket to me has always felt too cluttered.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:GitHub lost $66M in nine months of 2016 by StavrosK on Thursday December 15, 2016 @08:50PM (#13190435)
You can't really compare Github to Gitlab, when the former has a fifth the features of the latter.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:GitHub lost $66M in nine months of 2016 by smcl on Friday December 16, 2016 @08:10AM (#13192976)
Wait did you write that correctly - GitHub has less functionality/features than GitLab?
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:GitHub lost $66M in nine months of 2016 by StavrosK on Saturday December 17, 2016 @04:45PM (#13202846)
Yeah, much less. As the sibling says, GitLab has integrated CI/CD, extensive code review functionality (which GitHub just added), more fine-grained rules about who can merge what where, an integrated Docker hub, etc.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:GitHub lost $66M in nine months of 2016 by sytse on Friday December 16, 2016 @10:08AM (#13193717)
For example GitLab comes with complete CI and CD functionality https://about.gitlab.com/gitlab-ci/
[ Parent | on HN ]