GitHub lost $66M in nine months of 2016

Re:GitHub lost $66M in nine months of 2016 by 0x0 on Thursday December 15, 2016 @05:49PM (#13189392)

Well, I find both Bitbucket and Gitlab to be superior to GitHub in the UI department. I haven't even been able to find a graphical tree log of branches and commits on GitHub. ("network" on Gitlab, "commits" on Bitbucket). They also both offer unlimited private repositories (albeit bitbucket has a limit on the number of users granted access, but very cheap pricing if you need to bump the user limit.). GitHub only recently introduced unlimited private repositories on their pricing plans. For years GitHub priced themselves out of our reach (with 300+ private repositories, they didn't even offer this as an option beyond "call us")

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:GitHub lost $66M in nine months of 2016 by matthewbauer on Thursday December 15, 2016 @06:42PM (#13189803)

GitHub has a "network" tab under "Graphs" that might provide what you're looking for.

But when people say that GitHub has better UI, they're more talking about the clean menus and intuitive UI. Some of it might just be getting used to one design over another. Although, BitBucket to me has always felt too cluttered.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:GitHub lost $66M in nine months of 2016 by StavrosK on Thursday December 15, 2016 @08:50PM (#13190435)

You can't really compare Github to Gitlab, when the former has a fifth the features of the latter.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:GitHub lost $66M in nine months of 2016 by smcl on Friday December 16, 2016 @08:10AM (#13192976)

Wait did you write that correctly - GitHub has less functionality/features than GitLab?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:GitHub lost $66M in nine months of 2016 by StavrosK on Saturday December 17, 2016 @04:45PM (#13202846)

Yeah, much less. As the sibling says, GitLab has integrated CI/CD, extensive code review functionality (which GitHub just added), more fine-grained rules about who can merge what where, an integrated Docker hub, etc.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:GitHub lost $66M in nine months of 2016 by sytse on Friday December 16, 2016 @10:08AM (#13193717)

For example GitLab comes with complete CI and CD functionality https://about.gitlab.com/gitlab-ci/

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:GitHub lost $66M in nine months of 2016 by tcpekin on Thursday December 15, 2016 @06:38PM (#13189771)

I had the same issue with finding the tree log, it's under graphs and called network.

https://github.com/altmany/export_fig/network

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:GitHub lost $66M in nine months of 2016 by 0x0 on Friday December 16, 2016 @10:05AM (#13193688)

That one looks more like an overview of forks between account. Which is nice for open source projects probably, but isn't very helpful or informative for single-repo-multiple-branches. For example, no commit messages are shown by default.

[ Parent | on HN ]