News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The bank lent me $2m so I spent it on strippers and cars by 1024core on Thursday December 15, 2016 @11:20AM (#13185665)
But he didn't take out a loan. The bank kept giving him money whenever he wanted to withdraw it. That is not a loan. A loan requires explicit agreement and a fixed amount.
Re:The bank lent me $2m so I spent it on strippers and cars by bryanlarsen on Thursday December 15, 2016 @11:30AM (#13185750)
He signed a contract when he opened up the bank account. That contract would have included clauses establishing liability for overdrafts, even if the bank account didn't include an overdraft facility.
Re:The bank lent me $2m so I spent it on strippers and cars by Retric on Thursday December 15, 2016 @12:06PM (#13186106)
Last time I opened a bank account there was only a specific penalty for overdraft, but nothing beyond that in the contract.
Re:The bank lent me $2m so I spent it on strippers and cars by 1024core on Thursday December 15, 2016 @12:33PM (#13186357)
> That contract would have included clauses establishing liability for overdrafts

Maybe the contract did not include such a clause? There's a reason why he got acquitted in the end.

Re:The bank lent me $2m so I spent it on strippers and cars by nathanm412 on Thursday December 15, 2016 @01:24PM (#13186807)
He was acquitted because they charged him criminally instead of in civil court. He should have had collections go after him while he deals with wage garnishments, not jail time.
Re:The bank lent me $2m so I spent it on strippers and cars by bryanlarsen on Thursday December 15, 2016 @01:22PM (#13186794)
He got acquitted of fraud. That doesn't mean he's still not liable for the $2M unless the bankruptcy court relieves that liability.
Re:The bank lent me $2m so I spent it on strippers and cars by eridius on Thursday December 15, 2016 @01:48PM (#13187025)
Even if the contract did establish that, it's the bank's responsibility to handle the overdraft, it's not his responsibility to avoid overdrafting.