Re:The bank lent me $2m so I spent it on strippers and cars
by 1024core on Thursday December 15, 2016 @11:20AM
(#13185665)
But he didn't take out a loan. The bank kept giving him money whenever he wanted to withdraw it. That is not a loan. A loan requires explicit agreement and a fixed amount.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:The bank lent me $2m so I spent it on strippers and cars
by bryanlarsen on Thursday December 15, 2016 @11:30AM
(#13185750)
He signed a contract when he opened up the bank account. That contract would have included clauses establishing liability for overdrafts, even if the bank account didn't include an overdraft facility.
Re:The bank lent me $2m so I spent it on strippers and cars
by Retric on Thursday December 15, 2016 @12:06PM
(#13186106)
Last time I opened a bank account there was only a specific penalty for overdraft, but nothing beyond that in the contract.
Re:The bank lent me $2m so I spent it on strippers and cars
by 1024core on Thursday December 15, 2016 @12:33PM
(#13186357)
> That contract would have included clauses establishing liability for overdrafts
Maybe the contract did not include such a clause? There's a reason why he got acquitted in the end.
Re:The bank lent me $2m so I spent it on strippers and cars
by nathanm412 on Thursday December 15, 2016 @01:24PM
(#13186807)
He was acquitted because they charged him criminally instead of in civil court. He should have had collections go after him while he deals with wage garnishments, not jail time.
Re:The bank lent me $2m so I spent it on strippers and cars
by bryanlarsen on Thursday December 15, 2016 @01:22PM
(#13186794)
He got acquitted of fraud. That doesn't mean he's still not liable for the $2M unless the bankruptcy court relieves that liability.