Re:The bank lent me $2m so I spent it on strippers and cars
by nathanm412 on Thursday December 15, 2016 @01:24PM
(#13186807)
He was acquitted because they charged him criminally instead of in civil court. He should have had collections go after him while he deals with wage garnishments, not jail time.
Re:The bank lent me $2m so I spent it on strippers and cars
by bryanlarsen on Thursday December 15, 2016 @01:22PM
(#13186794)
He got acquitted of fraud. That doesn't mean he's still not liable for the $2M unless the bankruptcy court relieves that liability.
Maybe the contract did not include such a clause? There's a reason why he got acquitted in the end.