Firefox Hardware Report for Web Developers

Re:Firefox Hardware Report for Web Developers by Siecje on Thursday December 15, 2016 @09:10AM (#13184624)

What other options are there for graphics besides Intel, Nvidia, and AMD?

What is the other 3%?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Firefox Hardware Report for Web Developers by at-fates-hands on Thursday December 15, 2016 @11:08AM (#13185537)

Companies like 3DFX (which once one of the best and very notable with their GLIDE API) got bought by nvidia. Imagination Technologies (IMG) left the PC gpu market to focus solely on mobile gpu (Power VR series). on mobile there are still plenty company making gpu's like IMG (Power VR), Qualcomm (Adreno - which originated from ATI mobile division), Nvidia (ULP Geforce), ARM (Mali) and Intel

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Firefox Hardware Report for Web Developers by chei0iaV on Thursday December 15, 2016 @05:55PM (#13189440)

Matrox appears to still be alive and kicking:

http://www.matrox.com/graphics/en/products/graphics_cards/

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Firefox Hardware Report for Web Developers by hobarrera on Friday December 16, 2016 @02:00AM (#13191587)

There are VIA motherboards with build-in CPU and GPU for one (I had one of these for a small NAS, which could have been used for a very lightweight computer as well).

Raspberry Pi and stuff like that use other brands of GPU as well.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Firefox Hardware Report for Web Developers by PascLeRasc on Thursday December 15, 2016 @10:50AM (#13185358)

mobile phones in "request desktop site" mode? That's a wild guess.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Firefox Hardware Report for Web Developers by krallja on Thursday December 15, 2016 @12:20PM (#13186240)

They wouldn't be running Firefox for desktop.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Firefox Hardware Report for Web Developers by ReverseCold on Thursday December 15, 2016 @10:18AM (#13185111)

ARM stuff mabye?

[ Parent | on HN ]