News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:A Backdoor in Skype for Mac OS X by danudey on Tuesday December 13, 2016 @02:03PM (#13169646)
It seems to me to be a paranoid interpretation because if Microsoft wants to hand Skype-related user data over to the NSA, they'll do so on the server side and not the client side.

Secondly, this is a pretty stupid way of doing it. 'If you use this client identifier than anything goes' seems vastly more like a stupid coding mistake than it does a sneaky covert backdoor into accessing Skype from the local machine.

Re:A Backdoor in Skype for Mac OS X by sitkack on Tuesday December 13, 2016 @07:25PM (#13172688)
If I wanted to hand user data over to a 3rd party that tapped the entire backbone, I'd make that user data unencryptable. Why would I want to send Gbps of traffic to that third party? Then everyone would know. If they can just analyze the recorded traffic, none has to know.
Re:A Backdoor in Skype for Mac OS X by curried_haskell on Wednesday December 14, 2016 @09:02AM (#13175960)
Intelligence agencies want as many possible vectors for attack as possible. Especially unknown ones that you are not prepared for them to exploit. Everyone is assuming they wouldn't bother with a client backdoor... That right there is enough reason for them to get a client backdoor!