News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The Rule of Silence (2006) by TickleSteve on Tuesday December 13, 2016 @05:25AM (#13165857)
you already have a tool to check whether processes exist... 'ps'.

This is the essence of 'small, single purpose programs that work well with each other' rule.

Re:The Rule of Silence (2006) by bluetomcat on Tuesday December 13, 2016 @06:35AM (#13166082)
Actually, sending the zero signal to a pid as in `kill -0 <pid>` checks whether that pid exists and whether the calling process has permissions to send signals to it.
Re:The Rule of Silence (2006) by JdeBP on Tuesday December 13, 2016 @12:52PM (#13168808)
... at the point that the system call completed. There are no guarantees from that point onwards.

Interestingly, it would only take the addition of a pdopen() to something like FreeBSD's pdkill() to get enough for a tool that opened a process descriptor, sent a signal to the process, and determined (with poll() and pdwait4()) whether the process then exited; with the open-descriptor-style interface guaranteeing that it was always referencing the same process.