Re:Follow-up on Microsoft's H.264 choice for IE9
by smokinn on Monday May 03, 2010 @04:44PM
(#1316025)
No, I'd never seen that. It looks like exactly what I've wanted to recommend to people.
I didn't say I was happy with recommending handbrake, it was simply the least complicated option I had seen and my brother seemed to be able to muddle through so it was just good enough.
Miro looks a lot better though, thanks!
Re:Follow-up on Microsoft's H.264 choice for IE9
by ZeroGravitas on Tuesday May 04, 2010 @09:07AM
(#1317879)
Just to correct myself slightly it appear to be (currently) using MPEG4 part 2 (Xvid) for most of its presets, though they tested H.264 encodes for certain phones.
https://develop.participatoryculture.org/trac/democracy/wiki...
I'd be interested in their reasoning for this, though I remember for a while the best quality possible on iPods regardless of time to encode was high bitrate MPEG4. I wonder how big a difference there is at these screen sizes?
Have you tried the Miro Video Converter? It's supposed to be easy and does H.264 for iPod, Nexus 1 etc. as well as Theora at web rates:
http://www.mirovideoconverter.com/