News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:In Defense of Inclusionism by stormbrew on Monday December 12, 2016 @12:28PM (#13159860)
Surely a lower volume fork of wikipedia could somehow incorporate upstream changes in a more or less automated way? It seems like a site serious about doing this would work on some kind of moderated conflict resolution system for when it does happen, but the vast majority of pages would presumably not need it.
Re:In Defense of Inclusionism by lj3 on Tuesday December 13, 2016 @12:43PM (#13168737)
It's in the works. Forking something the size of wikipedia is a serious undertaking, not to mention the rickety pile of code it's built on. It's still early days.
Re:In Defense of Inclusionism by JBReefer on Monday December 12, 2016 @01:20PM (#13160355)
Yeah this seems like a great use of hg update nightly.