News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:In Defense of Inclusionism by akuchling on Monday December 12, 2016 @11:56AM (#13159536)
The problem for forks is to get enough users to keep up with ongoing events. For example, according to Infogalactic, Leonard Cohen is still alive: https://infogalactic.com/info/Leonard_Cohen

The Chicago Cubs haven't won a World Series since 1908: https://infogalactic.com/info/Chicago_Cubs

Without enough users, a snapshot of Wikipedia will quickly decay into unreliability. Most pages don't become inaccurate that fast, but you can't know if the page you're reading is one of them or not.

Re:In Defense of Inclusionism by stormbrew on Monday December 12, 2016 @12:28PM (#13159860)
Surely a lower volume fork of wikipedia could somehow incorporate upstream changes in a more or less automated way? It seems like a site serious about doing this would work on some kind of moderated conflict resolution system for when it does happen, but the vast majority of pages would presumably not need it.
Re:In Defense of Inclusionism by lj3 on Tuesday December 13, 2016 @12:43PM (#13168737)
It's in the works. Forking something the size of wikipedia is a serious undertaking, not to mention the rickety pile of code it's built on. It's still early days.
Re:In Defense of Inclusionism by JBReefer on Monday December 12, 2016 @01:20PM (#13160355)
Yeah this seems like a great use of hg update nightly.