Re:There are no acceptable ads
by baddox on Sunday December 11, 2016 @11:05PM
(#13155445)
Note that BookmarkSaver isn't merely claiming that you are obligated to curl a URL without grepping the output. He/she is claiming that after you curl the URL you are obligated to parse the response and execute all code and make every request described in the document (recursively, perhaps). It's a more laughable (or horrifying, or some combination) position than you are portraying it to be.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Just taking this argument to its logical conclusion: Can I be held liable for theft if I load an article on my smartphone, and it loses connection before the ad can be requested and loaded? :)
Re:There are no acceptable ads
by BookmarkSaver on Friday December 16, 2016 @01:27PM
(#13195465)
How the hell is that a "logical conclusion"? That is a ridiculous and completely unrelated point, and the fact that you somehow think that it is the "logical conclusion" just shows that you have no objectivity in the matter.
Re:There are no acceptable ads
by BookmarkSaver on Friday December 16, 2016 @01:31PM
(#13195496)
Thanks for making an idiotic and blatantly incorrect interpretation of my statement.