Re:Ask HN: What was your best passive income in 2016?
by lorenzhs on Sunday December 11, 2016 @06:04AM
(#13150547)
Historically, as a guideline, you'd have made about 7% p.a. on average, well above inflation. The question is whether you can handle the drawdown (can you keep your nerves during a crash?)
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Ask HN: What was your best passive income in 2016?
by mxschumacher on Sunday December 11, 2016 @08:49AM
(#13151048)
then again: beware of averages. Historical PE ratios are quite high (though EV/FCC would be more instructive) - so it is unlikely that the next couple of years will bring 7%. We're living in a world of free money: if central banks change interest rates the party could come to an end.
Re:Ask HN: What was your best passive income in 2016?
by xapata on Sunday December 11, 2016 @10:06AM
(#13151335)
Not necessarily. If the interest rates are reduced because the economy improved, then the growth could stay similar.
Re:Ask HN: What was your best passive income in 2016?
by stana on Sunday December 11, 2016 @11:24AM
(#13151718)
Aren't interest rates reduced to stimulate a struggling economy, and increased if economy improving?
Re:Ask HN: What was your best passive income in 2016?
by xapata on Monday December 12, 2016 @07:53PM
(#13163564)
Right. If interest rates are increased, that's a sign of a stronger economy and the market might go up in response. On the other hand, traders might decide the Fed is mistaken, the economy is not in fact stronger, and they'll react to the higher interest rates by taking fewer loans and the market will go down.
Basically, the change is already priced-in and you shouldn't worry about timing the market. Buy and hold.