Re:Linux kernel maintainer says no to AMDGPU patch
by gonmf on Friday December 09, 2016 @06:53AM
(#13138219)
Open source != free software.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Linux kernel maintainer says no to AMDGPU patch
by wolfgke on Friday December 09, 2016 @07:12AM
(#13138284)
The difference between open source and free software is mostly in the political camp the word comes from. Read the OSI definition of open source if you don't believe:
> https://opensource.org/osd-annotated
The reasons why "free software" people don't like the word "open source" are indeed political:
> https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/open-source-misses-the-point....
For software for which the source code is available, but does not give the four freedoms:
> https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-sw.html#content
it is common to use the word "shared source" (originally devised by Microsoft):
Re:Linux kernel maintainer says no to AMDGPU patch
by SXX on Friday December 09, 2016 @08:13AM
(#13138537)
Kernel driver of proprietary AMDGPU-PRO are licensed exactly same way as modules in mainline kernel. Most of them dual-licensed under MIT and GPL so BSD and other projects can use them.
Re:Linux kernel maintainer says no to AMDGPU patch
by majewsky on Friday December 09, 2016 @08:24AM
(#13138576)
But it is free software. It resides in the kernel tree: https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-st...