Re:H.264 patent license published for the first time by the FSF
by nitrogen on Sunday May 02, 2010 @05:16PM
(#1313235)
Adobe Reader isn't the only PDF-viewing software out there.
Re:H.264 patent license published for the first time by the FSF
by wmf on Sunday May 02, 2010 @02:21PM
(#1312881)
I agree that the whole "non-professional" thing seems blown out of proportion. After you've shot and edited your masterpiece, run it though a "professional" encoder and you're done.
Re:H.264 patent license published for the first time by the FSF
by please on Sunday May 02, 2010 @01:45PM
(#1312826)
Look for Canon 5D Mark II, it uses h264 and is used for commercial film production
Re:H.264 patent license published for the first time by the FSF
by frw on Sunday May 02, 2010 @04:46PM
(#1313155)
I work part-time for a production company and as far as I know, the industry standard is the RED Camera http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RED_Digital_Cinema, whose standard output is 2K-4K RAW.
Compressed formats that interpolate between keyframes (like MPEG) are generally a bad idea since they make precise cutting between clips a lot harder.
(I think the professional camera crowd doesn't do interframe compression in the camera anyway. It makes editing a little funny and they like very high quality source material. Google shopping for "video camera h.264" over $1000 only brought me a bunch of security camera packages.
The Canon Vixia HF S21 is over $1000 and contains the prohibition (well, the MPEG-2 version of it), sadly I can not paste it here because Canon set the no-copy bit on the downloadable PDF manual! Yes! That will defend the company from the evil threat of… umm… I can create no scenario where copying from the users' manual is a threat.)