Re:Intel x86 documentation has more pages than the 6502 has ...
by static_noise on Wednesday December 07, 2016 @04:32PM
(#13126411)
They continue to add transistors to newer processors. It is a good sign that someone keeps track of them and writes documentation on how to use all these new transistors.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Intel x86 documentation has more pages than the 6502 has ...
by Cyph0n on Wednesday December 07, 2016 @05:13PM
(#13126749)
I heard they added a couple of transistors to the latest Intel chips. One of the transistors hasn't been documented yet, though, which is unlike Intel.
Re:Intel x86 documentation has more pages than the 6502 has ...
by ethbro on Wednesday December 07, 2016 @07:04PM
(#13127389)
I'm imagining the documentation for an individual transistor that extends all the way up the stack... and thinking about Escher for some reason.
Re:Intel x86 documentation has more pages than the 6502 has ...
by mycall on Thursday December 08, 2016 @12:04AM
(#13128514)
This makes me wonder how many undocumented transistors are on the chips -- there because nobody knows why.
Re:Intel x86 documentation has more pages than the 6502 has ...
by andromeduck on Thursday December 08, 2016 @03:42AM
(#13129166)
Apparently Nvidia had to drop VBIOS a bit early because it started having issues but they no longer had enough people who knew how it worked to continue supporting the feature.