News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The Ruby+OMR JIT by orf on Friday December 02, 2016 @07:11AM (#13087947)
What's wrong with PyPy?
Re:The Ruby+OMR JIT by progman on Friday December 02, 2016 @08:27AM (#13088337)
Developers who like Python syntax and want C performance should seriously consider Nim.

http://nim-lang.org

Re:The Ruby+OMR JIT by weberc2 on Friday December 02, 2016 @11:07AM (#13089723)
What's the library story for Nim? Sincere question; not trying to start a flame war.
Re:The Ruby+OMR JIT by dagw on Friday December 02, 2016 @11:38AM (#13090026)
http://nim-lang.org/docs/lib.html

However many of the libraries list under "third party" are either unmaintained or not really ready for production. The stuff in the standard library seems pretty good though (although I've not used Nim for serious production work)

Re:The Ruby+OMR JIT by my123 on Friday December 02, 2016 @07:19AM (#13087994)
Good Python 3.x support...
Re:The Ruby+OMR JIT by brianwawok on Friday December 02, 2016 @08:37AM (#13088403)
It's like the bad parts of Java mixed with Python to get a little more perf
Re:The Ruby+OMR JIT by orf on Friday December 02, 2016 @11:32AM (#13089968)
Except it's nothing like that, it's like an interpreter framework written in Python with a reference implementation that happens to be a Python interpreter. Write your interpreter in RPython, use the right decorators and boom you have a compiled interpreter with a free JIT (with speeds that beat C in some workloads, apparently).

Pretty cool. Pretty unlike Java I think.

Re:The Ruby+OMR JIT by pjmlp on Friday December 02, 2016 @02:16PM (#13091421)
> Pretty unlike Java I think.

Time to learn about Graal, which will be partially integrated into Java 9.

https://wiki.openjdk.java.net/display/Graal/Publications+and...

Or JikesRVM for that matter, http://www.jikesrvm.org/