News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The Ruby+OMR JIT by appleflaxen on Friday December 02, 2016 @05:49AM (#13087615)
Tried looking in github, project-specific pages, wikipedia and still have no clue:

What does OMR stand for?

<something><something>runtime?

Re:The Ruby+OMR JIT by magaudet on Friday December 02, 2016 @09:58AM (#13088995)
Officially, OMR is a meaningless title, like LLVM. Similar to LLVM, it once stood for something, but then we realized that it didn't actually match the project's 'charter' quite as well as we had hoped... but had grown fond of the name (also... finding new names is super hard).

Original definition was 'Open Managed Runtimes', but we can do more than just managed runtimes with OMR technology, and so that seemed to sell it short.

Re:The Ruby+OMR JIT by coldnebo on Friday December 02, 2016 @06:14AM (#13087712)
Doesn't seem to stand for anything (at least it's not defined in the project charter).

If I had to guess at it:

Open Meta-Runtime

But I could see how that might be misinterpreted compared to their goals. Not all cap names are acronyms?

https://projects.eclipse.org/proposals/omr

Re:The Ruby+OMR JIT by forkandgrok on Friday December 02, 2016 @06:16AM (#13087721)
It stands for Open Managed Runtime.
Re:The Ruby+OMR JIT by rubyfan on Friday December 02, 2016 @07:42AM (#13088104)
Is the Open really open, as in acceptable license that won't hold it back from gaining adoption in OSS and Enterprise community - or - are there licensing, patents or other proprietary strings attached?
Re:The Ruby+OMR JIT by sanxiyn on Friday December 02, 2016 @07:59AM (#13088179)
OMR is under Apache License. https://github.com/eclipse/omr