News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Uber Now Tracks Passengers’ Locations Even After They’re ... by dx034 on Friday December 02, 2016 @02:46AM (#13086881)
Whatsapp was ethical, the problem is with the company that bought them. And they didn't necessarily know that when they sold (even if, an offer of that size is hard to decline).
Re:Uber Now Tracks Passengers’ Locations Even After They’re ... by newscracker on Friday December 02, 2016 @03:50AM (#13087124)
[Harsh words ahead]

Hindsight is 20/20, and based on that I personally would say WhatsApp was not ethical even when it was a standalone company. If it had been so, it wouldn't have allowed Facebook to acquire it in the first place! I realize this sounds harsh and probably implies bad motives on the owners, but whatever WhatsApp wrote in its blogs pre-acquisition were all principles that could be sold at the right price. That's exactly what it has come to now that we know how it's being used.

I would also consider it insulting to human intelligence if the WhatsApp founders had truly believed that they would be able to continue with their stated privacy stance after being bought by Facebook, of all companies (what they wrote on the blog at that time can be seen as public posturing).

Re:Uber Now Tracks Passengers’ Locations Even After They’re ... by SixSigma on Friday December 02, 2016 @07:15AM (#13087967)
You don't need hindsight. You just need to look at the many many times it has happened before.

Cash pressure + lots of valuable assets liquidised legally that just require a change to ToS = said assets for sale + temporary bad PR.

Re:Uber Now Tracks Passengers’ Locations Even After They’re ... by stephenr on Friday December 02, 2016 @03:30AM (#13087046)
I call bullshit on not knowing that Facebook is a privacy whoring company before WhatsApp sold to them.
Re:Uber Now Tracks Passengers’ Locations Even After They’re ... by kkoomi on Friday December 02, 2016 @06:05AM (#13087682)
Hey, who cares about ethics when there's billions of dollars on the table /s
Re:Uber Now Tracks Passengers’ Locations Even After They’re ... by antihero on Friday December 02, 2016 @11:17AM (#13089815)
I mean who wouldn't have realistically accepted literally billions of dollars to sell an app people willingly install on their phones? Ethics is all relative.
Re:Uber Now Tracks Passengers’ Locations Even After They’re ... by stephenr on Friday December 02, 2016 @01:04PM (#13090807)
Were they profitable before? Were the controlling parties financially comfortable?

If my company is profitable (or has revenue growth and is likely to become profitable) and a scummy company wants to buy it, I'm going to say no.

Hard as it may be for some of the HN/VC crowd to believe, but there are people out there who start companies with their own money, because they believe in something. At no point does "find some fat megacorp to buy us our" enter the game plan.

Re:Uber Now Tracks Passengers’ Locations Even After They’re ... by kbart on Friday December 02, 2016 @03:22AM (#13087019)
That's exactly my point. If company is ethical today, it doesn't mean it will be tomorrow, for whatever reasons.
Re:Uber Now Tracks Passengers’ Locations Even After They’re ... by geofft on Friday December 02, 2016 @11:19AM (#13089830)
> an offer of that size is hard to decline

Ethics isn't about doing the right thing when it's easy.