News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Why Are Developers Still Pouring Billions into Waterlogge... by throwaway98237 on Tuesday November 29, 2016 @05:23PM (#13066745)
Why is humanity still pumping unsustainable levels of greenhouse gases into the atmosphere when all the science points to that being a road that leads to catastrophic consequences which we can't predict?
Re:Why Are Developers Still Pouring Billions into Waterlogge... by PeterisP on Tuesday November 29, 2016 @08:46PM (#13067767)
First, this is a classic example of tragedy of commons - if you lower emissions, then you bear all the costs but a tiny fraction of the benefit;

Second, even if coordination can be solved, by and large the groups/areas that can make a meaningful reduction are not the groups/areas that will bear most of the consequences, there's no such thing as a single, aligned direction of interest/benefit for humanity.

Re:Why Are Developers Still Pouring Billions into Waterlogge... by throwaway98237 on Wednesday November 30, 2016 @11:31AM (#13072071)
I think we can all agree that another mass extinction event and chaotic weather pattern upheavals are both bad things.
Re:Why Are Developers Still Pouring Billions into Waterlogge... by acchow on Tuesday November 29, 2016 @09:07PM (#13067858)
This is a different problem known as tragedy of the commons.
Re:Why Are Developers Still Pouring Billions into Waterlogge... by jcranmer on Tuesday November 29, 2016 @07:39PM (#13067503)
What would you, personally, give up to make that happen?
Re:Why Are Developers Still Pouring Billions into Waterlogge... by Johnny555 on Tuesday November 29, 2016 @07:57PM (#13067602)
For what it's worth, I've given up my car (I live within easy biking distance of work), live in a small townhouse (heating costs $20/month in the winter thanks to good insulation and neighbors eliminating heat loss to the sides). I purchase few goods, and try to keep most things as long as possible. Most of my entertainment/shopping is within walking/biking distance. I try to limit waste and compost/recycle everything I can.

My electrical usage is so low that I don't think installing solar would be a net win in carbon emissions.

Based on various calculators, my carbon footprint is about half that of a typical American. Now can I ask for a 28% decrease in carbon emissions?

Re:Why Are Developers Still Pouring Billions into Waterlogge... by throwaway98237 on Wednesday November 30, 2016 @11:30AM (#13072055)
I'm vegan. I ride public transit when possible, and moved next door to my job so I don't need to commute on a daily basis, I buy used whenever possible, and try not to buy stuff I don't need. I take carbon into consideration when making holiday plans (a few plane rides can double a persons carbon footprint). I compost. Future changes I'm trying to make include going to local farmers market and growing more of my own food, switching to solar power. But, realistically, I'm only one person. If everyone went vegan today, gave up cars (for bikes) and planes (for electric trains), and we started growing 51% of our food locally we'd be well on our way to meeting carbon emission reduction goals. The technology has been around for awhile. The will to make the choices has not. Which is why, I'm a pessimist on these issues.
Re:Why Are Developers Still Pouring Billions into Waterlogge... by loader on Tuesday November 29, 2016 @08:00PM (#13067611)
I gave up meat (except fish) 13 years ago. Not because of climate change but I keep it going in part because of it now.

Look into how much water and food you need to grow cows.

Re:Why Are Developers Still Pouring Billions into Waterlogge... by stoic on Tuesday November 29, 2016 @05:28PM (#13066773)
Inertia