Re:China’s New Tool for Social Control: A Credit Rating for ...
by gaelian on Monday November 28, 2016 @09:32PM
(#13060269)
Perhaps "resupply" would have been a better word.
Re:China’s New Tool for Social Control: A Credit Rating for ...
by brilliantcode on Tuesday November 29, 2016 @06:35PM
(#13067174)
you are correct I did make a mistake there.
However, like the other comment suggested, nuclear carriers rarely travel alone without the protection of large naval assets deployed around it.
If only AI was running all of the naval air assets on a carrier, no food, self sustaining & maintaining.
I'd imagine an increase of frequency in US naval carrier groups patrolling oceans closer as a result of the cost savings of reducing manned staff with AI and robots but that's another topic.
Re:China’s New Tool for Social Control: A Credit Rating for ...
by dingaling on Tuesday November 29, 2016 @06:09AM
(#13062309)
Escort ships need to be refuelled; the plurality of a carrier group is oil-burning.
Re:China’s New Tool for Social Control: A Credit Rating for ...
by frugalmail on Monday November 28, 2016 @09:11PM
(#13060149)
It's to avoid Scurvy
> any port it chooses to refuel in
Do we have a lot of ports to refuel nuclear powered aircraft carriers?