News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Stallman’s Law. Parent comment

Re:Stallman’s Law by sedachv on Monday November 28, 2016 @02:29AM (#13053975)
In reply to user misrepresent, who seems to have signed up to HN just to attack RMS:

Wrong.

"Revision 1.29 February 9 1998 esr Changed ``free software'' to ``open source''. "

http://www.catb.org/~esr/writings/cathedral-bazaar/cathedral...

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Stallman’s Law by misrepresent on Monday November 28, 2016 @03:07AM (#13054088)
I haven't attacked anyone, and I haven't even mentioned RMS until now. That's a very weird accusation.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Stallman’s Law by cyphar on Tuesday November 29, 2016 @12:19AM (#13061021)
While claiming that referencing first-hand sources from both sides of the aisle as a "bullshit argument" isn't attacking anyone, you're not contributing to a healthy discussion.
[ Parent | on HN ]