News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Theranos and David Boies Cut Legal Ties by michaelcampbell on Friday November 25, 2016 @12:46AM (#13034626)
> and they paid the price.

Who paid? Seems to me the taxpayers did.

Re:Theranos and David Boies Cut Legal Ties by edblarney on Friday November 25, 2016 @01:45AM (#13034769)
"Who paid? Seems to me the taxpayers did"

The thousands of bankers that lost their jobs.

Major banks collapsed.

Entire divisions were shut down.

Banks did not concoct their near-death demise, even though it was self-inflicted.

Yes, arguably taxpayers 'paid' as well with unfair bailouts, but there's no case to be made that the banks 'won' in this one. They would have preferred to avoid that crash altogether.

I'm not suggesting that they are not mostly 'at fault' - but they were not criminal, is my point.

It would be unwise to seek to blood when really what is needed is some smarter regulatory conditions.

Re:Theranos and David Boies Cut Legal Ties by cmdrfred on Friday November 25, 2016 @07:35AM (#13036277)
Would the taxpayers have received a payout if the banks bets went as planned? The taxpayers absorbed the risk from the banks, they won.
Re:Theranos and David Boies Cut Legal Ties by ryanlol on Friday November 25, 2016 @10:48AM (#13037486)
Taxpayers seem to have received excessively good deals on mortgages.
Re:Theranos and David Boies Cut Legal Ties by cmdrfred on Friday November 25, 2016 @11:00AM (#13037587)
People who had mortgages received benefits perhaps, not taxpayers in general.