Re:Edward Snowden Demonstrates How Easy It Is to Hack a Voti...
by dghf on Thursday November 24, 2016 @05:25PM
(#13033164)
> You'd be surprised how many of those paper ballots don't get recognized when they are counted. Because the checkmarks don't fill up the box enough or because of optical/scantron error.
In the UK's 2014 elections for the European Parliament, a Scottish voter wrote against the four parties/candidates listed: "wank"; "wank"; "good guy"; "wank".
The vote was deemed valid as the voter had expressed a clear preference.
(Source: https://twitter.com/JamieRoss7/status/473068708441894912/pho...)
Re:Edward Snowden Demonstrates How Easy It Is to Hack a Voti...
by brassic on Thursday November 24, 2016 @06:05PM
(#13033349)
There was another case where the voter drew a penis next to the conservative candidate and it counted as a vote:
http://www.itv.com/news/wales/update/2015-05-08/angry-voter-...
Re:Edward Snowden Demonstrates How Easy It Is to Hack a Voti...
by Symbiote on Thursday November 24, 2016 @04:06PM
(#13032764)
Ballots are counted by hand in the UK.
There are pictures and a description here: http://www.bbc.com/news/election-2015-england-32533064
Re:Edward Snowden Demonstrates How Easy It Is to Hack a Voti...
by rhino369 on Saturday November 26, 2016 @12:51AM
(#13041946)
Yikes that is even worse. Hand counts have been shown to be off by 1-2%.
Re:Edward Snowden Demonstrates How Easy It Is to Hack a Voti...
by hacker_9 on Thursday November 24, 2016 @04:07PM
(#13032767)
Actually in the UK votes are counted manually by people in big halls under watch by accredited observers. No voting machine in the process at all.
Re:Edward Snowden Demonstrates How Easy It Is to Hack a Voti...
by robryan on Thursday November 24, 2016 @03:57PM
(#13032711)
Sure that happens to a small portion, if the result is close enough though you can go back over them by hand.
The difference is that the voting machine makes it possible to hack the paper trail.
The only benefit is that you have a paper record that can be corroborated if there is evidence of hacking later. But we could do a printout paper record on voting machines too.
You'd be surprised how many of those paper ballots don't get recognized when they are counted. Because the checkmarks don't fill up the box enough or because of optical/scantron error.