News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Reddit’s CEO edited comments that criticized him by jessedhillon on Thursday November 24, 2016 @05:08AM (#13029457)
They clearly and routinely fall outside the bounds of acceptable discourse, which are already wide on a site like Reddit.

Edit: and routinely

Re:Reddit’s CEO edited comments that criticized him by ww520 on Thursday November 24, 2016 @05:13AM (#13029478)
What are the bounds of acceptable discourse in Reddit?
Re:Reddit’s CEO edited comments that criticized him by jessedhillon on Thursday November 24, 2016 @05:16AM (#13029492)
Oh, here's a thing you could've googled: https://www.reddit.com/help/contentpolicy/
Re:Reddit’s CEO edited comments that criticized him by ww520 on Thursday November 24, 2016 @05:23AM (#13029515)
Thanks for pointing it out.
Re:Reddit’s CEO edited comments that criticized him by jessedhillon on Thursday November 24, 2016 @05:28AM (#13029538)
I was sarcastic to you because your question was answerable in ten seconds of googling, which suggests to me an insincere line of questioning.
Re:Reddit’s CEO edited comments that criticized him by ww520 on Thursday November 24, 2016 @05:39AM (#13029579)
Well, acceptable discourse is often used as a vague pretext for censorship. And Googling of "acceptable discourse Reddit" doesn't have much useful result. It's good to clarify the specifics.
Re:Reddit’s CEO edited comments that criticized him by matt4077 on Thursday November 24, 2016 @05:17AM (#13029495)
They should be same as everywhere, and when your community becomes fixated on a conspiracy involving Hilary Clinton, Podesta, and a pedophile sex ring you should stop and ask:

"How far have I strolled from the herd?"

Re:Reddit’s CEO edited comments that criticized him by ww520 on Thursday November 24, 2016 @05:25AM (#13029522)
So basically they have different views, and thus bannable.