News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Jill Stein to file for recount in three states by postcarnival on Thursday November 24, 2016 @12:41AM (#13028433)
Let's not pretend this is some altruistic "academic" endeavor to satiate some curiosity. This is a thought-out play borne out of the rejection of the election result by the left.
Re:Jill Stein to file for recount in three states by rbanffy on Thursday November 24, 2016 @03:37AM (#13029078)
Don't you think a significant difference between districts where everything is similar except for the voting mechanism, with a trend to favor a specific candidate on one hard-to-audit mechanism is suspicious?
Re:Jill Stein to file for recount in three states by postcarnival on Friday November 25, 2016 @06:07AM (#13035864)
It might be so, but I also find reports of 3+ million illegals, 4+ million dead people, and other alleged acts of fraud to be suspicious... If we're going to go down that path it won't be pretty and it will likely involve more than just those 3 states. That said from what I read MI has already declared they've certified (recounted) their results so at this point Stein is just hustling money. I do wish technology could advance our voting systems on the whole though.. possibly block-chain based? but might require voter id! oye
Re:Jill Stein to file for recount in three states by Melchira on Friday November 25, 2016 @09:52AM (#13037067)
Citation needed for those claims. As far as I can tell they come from a guy on twitter who refuses to share the data or explain his methodology. Parroting unverified and most likely false claims like this only serves to legitimize the fake "news sites" that publish this stuff without fact checking.
Re:Jill Stein to file for recount in three states by postcarnival on Saturday November 26, 2016 @03:29PM (#13045680)
When did I "parrot" anything as truth? I said I find it highly suspicious. If you want to go down the path of "fake news" sites how about we talk about almost every major network that had Clinton winning in a landslide?