News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Open Source .NET – 2 years later by embiggen on Thursday November 24, 2016 @12:07AM (#13028275)
Has it really been 2 years already? I'm still waiting for a decent build system for .NET projects for Linux or macOS. Last time I tried (~6 months ago), it was a tire fire.
Re:Open Source .NET – 2 years later by ungzd on Thursday November 24, 2016 @07:29AM (#13029963)
It's even more tire fire now: they're announced 'project.json' build system, but deprecated it[1] in favor of older msbuild. But it's still mentioned on front page of .NET core[2] and used as the primary build system in latest version (I don't know if .NET core even has msbuild, tried only mono).

Almost everyone think that you need some specific IDE (either Visual Studio or Monodevelop/Xamarin Studio/VS for mac (this is the same thing lol)), even in opensource communities[3].

And MSDN is the slowest and hardest to use web documentation I ever seen. Everything non-Windows non-VS is still very, very second-class.

[1] https://blogs.msdn.microsoft.com/dotnet/2016/05/23/changes-t...

[2] https://www.microsoft.com/net/core

[3] http://community.monogame.net/t/creating-a-new-monogame-proy...

Re:Open Source .NET – 2 years later by enricosada on Thursday November 24, 2016 @09:48AM (#13030563)
ms is maintaining project.json based sdk too with version preview2, so devs can continue to work, no need to switch to new msbuild soon (wait until is done).

ide are good (intellsiense/debugging), especially vscode, but sdk works already from command line and text editor.

about docs, check the new docs website (oss, accept pr):

- https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/articles/core/

- the getting started doc https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/articles/core/gettin... has tutorial for everyone (cli/vs/vscode/xam), and all os. is not vs centric

Re:Open Source .NET – 2 years later by pjmlp on Thursday November 24, 2016 @01:24PM (#13031858)
> And MSDN is the slowest and hardest to use web documentation I ever seen

It is also one of the best company provided documentation out there.

Have you ever used online documentation from Apple, Google, Borland, SAP, Oracle, ...?

Re:Open Source .NET – 2 years later by electricEmu on Thursday November 24, 2016 @12:41AM (#13028431)
Either FAKE (F# Make) or CAKE (C# Make) work perfectly on NIX/BSD systems. The new build system FOR .NET Core works great too with `dotnet build`.
Re:Open Source .NET – 2 years later by FlorianRappl on Thursday November 24, 2016 @05:10AM (#13029464)
Yes, Cake is wonderful, however, I had great problems bringing it to work due to a lot of issues with NuGet v3 (UTC positive offset bug, looking for msbuild.exe to restore packages, ...). Luckily, I could switch to NuGet v2.

Bottom line is: CAKE is great, but if the project depends on things that are not covered by dotnet core one is still screwed.

Re:Open Source .NET – 2 years later by ungzd on Thursday November 24, 2016 @07:30AM (#13029964)
> The new build system FOR .NET Core works great too with `dotnet build`

They've deprecated it: https://blogs.msdn.microsoft.com/dotnet/2016/05/23/changes-t...

Re:Open Source .NET – 2 years later by matthewwarren on Thursday November 24, 2016 @07:34AM (#13029972)
`dotnet build` still works, they've just changed the underlying implementation from the 'project.json' based one to instead use MBBuild
Re:Open Source .NET – 2 years later by enricosada on Thursday November 24, 2016 @09:43AM (#13030528)
just `dotnet migrate` if you have an old project.json, or create a new one with `dotnet new`.

after that as usual

- dotnet restore

- dotnet build

- dotnet run

- dotnet pack

- dotnet publish

- dotnet test

the cli is the same, the dotnet/cli team added other commands too (dotnet msbuild, dotnet clean, and more in development using an extensibility to install global commands)

Re:Open Source .NET – 2 years later by matthewwarren on Thursday November 24, 2016 @09:56AM (#13030597)
> the dotnet/cli team added other commands too (dotnet msbuild, dotnet clean, and more in development using an extensibility to install global commands)

Yeah the cmd extensibility story it pretty nice, I had a go at writing a 'dotnet benchmark' cmd and it was pretty straight-forward, see http://mattwarren.org/2016/10/03/Adding-a-verb-to-the-dotnet...

Re:Open Source .NET – 2 years later by ghuntley on Thursday November 24, 2016 @07:46AM (#13030022)
Re:Open Source .NET – 2 years later by louhike on Thursday November 24, 2016 @09:36AM (#13030494)
I might be off topic, but JetBrains is making a cross-platform .NET IDE which is currently in open beta. I tested it and it had no difficulties to open/build/execute existing solutions.
Re:Open Source .NET – 2 years later by flukus on Thursday November 24, 2016 @12:13AM (#13028310)
Make?