News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Reddit CEO admits to altering user comments that were cri... by Natsu on Wednesday November 23, 2016 @08:44PM (#13027329)
> It's more concerning that Congress is that stupid

Congress was looking at evidence of what that particular user was doing online at the time, because /u/stonetear posted questions that look rather incriminating in retrospect based on what we've learned since then.

This kind of thing is why it's important to establish a chain of custody for evidence.

Re:Reddit CEO admits to altering user comments that were cri... by jessaustin on Thursday November 24, 2016 @09:42AM (#13030526)
This episode makes clear that uttering "Reddit" and "chain of custody" in the same sentence should get one laughed out of court.
Re:Reddit CEO admits to altering user comments that were cri... by Natsu on Thursday November 24, 2016 @01:14PM (#13031780)
Maybe. It depends on what internal controls they have (or don't) and whether it was evident to other admins that the comments had been altered.

There's a lot we don't know without knowing the internal workings of Reddit, though I agree that you can't have to think that if one rogue person (even someone like that) can just do such things, they don't have robust internal controls at all.