News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Watch out: ɢoogle.com isn’t the same as Google.com. Parent comment

Re:Watch out: ɢoogle.com isn’t the same as Google.com by tlrobinson on Monday November 21, 2016 @09:02AM (#13005388)
Not sure why you're getting downvited, people seem to have missed your clever use of the Cyrillic "o".
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Watch out: ɢoogle.com isn’t the same as Google.com by amelius on Monday November 21, 2016 @09:38AM (#13005674)
Why is the Cyrillic "o" even a separate glyph/charcode, even though it looks like a regular "o"?
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Watch out: ɢoogle.com isn’t the same as Google.com by ozim on Monday November 21, 2016 @09:48AM (#13005755)
Probably because it is rotated 360°.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Watch out: ɢoogle.com isn’t the same as Google.com by mamadrood on Monday November 21, 2016 @10:25AM (#13006023)
Because it looks like an "o" in Verdana, but it could look different than the "o" in an other font.
[ Parent | on HN ]