Re:Setting a new world record in CloudSort with Apache Spark
by rxin on Tuesday November 15, 2016 @09:10PM
(#12964004)
I'd argue this (performance/cost) is exactly the right metric to measure. One of the biggest benefits of the cloud is elasticity. In on-premise world, one would have to provision based on peak demand, and most of the time the cluster utilization rate is pretty low.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Setting a new world record in CloudSort with Apache Spark
by flukus on Tuesday November 15, 2016 @09:24PM
(#12964045)
But it's cost for every iteration for cloud vs a once off cost for on premise. It doesn't take very long for on premise to get cheaper.
Re:Setting a new world record in CloudSort with Apache Spark
by rxin on Tuesday November 15, 2016 @09:52PM
(#12964163)
The one-off cost is very high, and there is higher ongoing maintenance cost as well. Most organizations are moving to the cloud, because it in general makes more economic sense.
Re:Setting a new world record in CloudSort with Apache Spark
by flukus on Tuesday November 15, 2016 @10:55PM
(#12964420)
I'm really not seeing most organizations moving to the cloud. It only makes sense economically for the smallest companies/organisations that can't afford maintenance costs. Most bigger ones won't risk the loss of their core data and a lot can't go to the cloud for various reasons like legality, speed and redundancy.