Re:CockroachDB Stability Post-Mortem: From 1 Node to 100 Nodes
by qaq on Tuesday November 15, 2016 @10:33PM
(#12964349)
Why would you use spanner inspired system for medium size business with low query volume :)?
Re:CockroachDB Stability Post-Mortem: From 1 Node to 100 Nodes
by andrewchambers on Wednesday November 16, 2016 @03:11AM
(#12965283)
I like the idea of a self healing cluster where each node is equal and the amount of work required to maintain and migrate it is kept to a minimum.
Re:CockroachDB Stability Post-Mortem: From 1 Node to 100 Nodes
by andrewchambers on Wednesday November 16, 2016 @03:31AM
(#12965351)
I misspoke, i meant with moderate latency requirements. I have a product in mind where the queries don't require high performance. Instead i value availability without babysitting.
Re:CockroachDB Stability Post-Mortem: From 1 Node to 100 Nodes
by anonymous7777 on Tuesday November 15, 2016 @08:55PM
(#12963957)
Do I need to take you seriously?! You don't have to play a "victim" role here You can just keep scratching someone's back. "Medium sized businesses" don't stop doing their business because of CockroachDB. They were able to do just fine with whatever systems/databases they were using prior to CockroachDB existence.
Even with lower performance I can see use cases where the ease of configuration works. Medium sized businesses with relatively low query volume seem like a good fit to me.