Re:US Navy denies it pirated 550K copies of software, says c...
by eb0la on Tuesday November 15, 2016 @10:09AM
(#12958587)
Mistake or not, they are liable.
Remember kids, don't just ask: Is this software licensed?
If yes, ask then: Is this software licensed enough?
Then you can install it.
Re:US Navy denies it pirated 550K copies of software, says c...
by dahart on Tuesday November 15, 2016 @10:34AM
(#12958801)
Absolutely right. But, on the flip side, this may be the situation the contractor wanted. Based only on the info I have, I'd speculate it's possible the contractor knew about the large number of installs and even pushed for that along the way.
According to this short article, the contract they were hoping for was truly enormous. There's certainly incentive for the contractor to let the Navy install as many copies at it wants to use, because the more the Navy wants the software, the higher likelihood of big money. Whether the Navy pays for it first, or gets itself in a bind and ends up on the hook for fees, either way the contractor gets a lot of money.
Re:US Navy denies it pirated 550K copies of software, says c...
by bitJericho on Tuesday November 15, 2016 @09:55AM
(#12958460)
Sounds like a violation of the DMCA
I'm a big fan of trying to imagine reasonable possibilities and giving both sides of any story I hear the benefit of the doubt.
But, in this case it's hard for me to think this is a mistake when the Navy's own argument is that it was intentional because they feel they had the right. A mistake like that may actually be defensible in court, and there would likely even be logs on the Navy-public server, not to mention logs of the communication that spread some kind of internal viral download -- half a million installs don't just happen without people talking.