Re:Amazon RDS now supports PostgreSQL 9.6.1
by ignoramous on Tuesday November 15, 2016 @12:56AM
(#12955946)
Heroku isn't a competitor to AWS, AFAIK. They're a partner.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Amazon RDS now supports PostgreSQL 9.6.1
by markonen on Tuesday November 15, 2016 @03:30AM
(#12956490)
In this context it's useful to note that RDS instance pricing is ~50% higher than the pricing for the underlying EC2 instances. That 50% reflects the (pure software) value-add over EC2.
When someone like Heroku offers a competing product, the fact that the product is also being run on EC2 is only a part of the overall story. Over time, AWS will probably be less and less happy with earning just the bare infrastructure dollars for such use.
Re:Amazon RDS now supports PostgreSQL 9.6.1
by merb on Tuesday November 15, 2016 @03:36AM
(#12956513)
> In this context it's useful to note that RDS instance pricing is ~50% higher than the pricing for the underlying EC2 instances. That 50% reflects the (pure software) value-add over EC2.
Just build a HA RDS Cluster yourself with Click and Scale, than you can sell it to me with ~25% higher prices than the EC2 instances. Btw. AWS RDS is cheaper than most other competitors like ElephantSQL.
Re:Amazon RDS now supports PostgreSQL 9.6.1
by markonen on Tuesday November 15, 2016 @03:40AM
(#12956540)
Just stating a fact about their pricing (in the context of whether Heroku is a competitor or not). Not judging the relative value of the offerings at all. I'm an RDS user, FWIW.
Re:Amazon RDS now supports PostgreSQL 9.6.1
by wasd on Tuesday November 15, 2016 @02:14AM
(#12956227)
Sorry, I'm not sure what you mean. It used to be the case that Heroku is/was built on EC2. They also offered a managed database (Heroku Postgres) built on EC2. Do you mean they're a partner because they're building a product on top of EC2?