News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:“I have toyota corola” by IshKebab on Monday November 14, 2016 @08:58AM (#12949800)
Surely example.com has these problems too, although to be fair they don't really need to receive any email.
Re:“I have toyota corola” by js2 on Monday November 14, 2016 @09:07AM (#12949843)
example.com does not receive e-mail. It is specifically set aside (along with example.{net,org} and a few TLDs) for testing:

https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2606

Re:“I have toyota corola” by 0xcde4c3db on Monday November 14, 2016 @09:13AM (#12949878)
example.com has an empty MX record, so you can't really send email to it anyway.
Re:“I have toyota corola” by 0x0 on Monday November 14, 2016 @09:46AM (#12950057)
I believe SMTP attempts delivery to the A record if there is no MX record.
Re:“I have toyota corola” by Xylakant on Monday November 14, 2016 @10:11AM (#12950220)
Indeed, if no MX record is known, but an A record is, mail will be sent to that host. However, example.(com,org) are designated testing domains by RFC and any self-respecting mail server should know not to forward mails there. And on top of that, since the domains are designated testing domains, they do not accept mails.
Re:“I have toyota corola” by jakobdabo on Monday November 14, 2016 @01:01PM (#12951788)
The right thing to do in this situation is to use RFC 7505[1] (Null MX Records).

[1] https://2rfc.net/7505

Re:“I have toyota corola” by Xylakant on Monday November 14, 2016 @03:50PM (#12953220)
Cool, didn't know that. Thanks for teaching me something today.
Re:“I have toyota corola” by teddyh on Monday November 14, 2016 @09:22AM (#12949933)
“Empty”? It does not have an MX record.
Re:“I have toyota corola” by 0xcde4c3db on Monday November 14, 2016 @06:54PM (#12954431)
You're right; I must have misread the dig output. I thought it showed an MX record with no hostname, but that was probably the question section.