Re:The Apache Cassandra battle highlights major problem with...
by redwood on Sunday November 13, 2016 @05:14PM
(#12945991)
Cool, do you see HBase being used in prod? (Outside of Google that is). Who's using it?
Re:The Apache Cassandra battle highlights major problem with...
by startuploser on Monday November 14, 2016 @02:16PM
(#12952446)
I've seen hbase used in production at a number of startups, and worked at one where it was used. It's very powerful and flexible, but it's also not like running any other database. Setting up Cassandra is like "java cassandra.jar". Setting up HBase is...someone's job for a while is going to be "running HBase".
Anyway, I'm talking about small-ish startups that aren't super researchy technological trailblazers. There are definitely people outside of microsoft (I'm assuming that's what you meant instead of Google as Google already had BigTable and HBase started out as a Powerset project and so ended up at Microsoft) running HBase in production.
Re:The Apache Cassandra battle highlights major problem with...
by x0x0 on Sunday November 13, 2016 @07:31PM
(#12946664)
I heard Flurry has something like 2k+ nodes. Though post Yahoo acquisition, who knows what's going on.
My company does quite unfortunately; we don't really have enough data to make it necessary and it was justified w/ vague notions of scaling blah blah blah.
Re:The Apache Cassandra battle highlights major problem with...
by linuxhansl on Friday November 18, 2016 @04:23AM
(#12985472)
Facebook, Salesforce, Google (just the HBase client APIs, though), Flurry (now Yahoo), Yahoo, Apple (Siri), Pinterest, Twitter, Rocketfuel, Huawai, SiftScience, just to name some.
I work at one of the above :) where we run many, many thousand HBase servers.
Re:The Apache Cassandra battle highlights major problem with...
by bsg75 on Monday November 14, 2016 @01:31PM
(#12952053)
There is an interesting article about HBase vs Cassandra et al here: http://www.infoworld.com/article/3066358/analytics/hbase-the...
I cannot validate or refute any of it. Hoping some here can.
Re:The Apache Cassandra battle highlights major problem with...
by intsunny on Sunday November 13, 2016 @08:30PM
(#12946868)
Hbase is approaching a decade of age. It is well understood, rock solid, and pretty much ever error is googleable. There are numerous companies that run it in production. Hbase may not get the press Cassandra does because of it is not as easy to setup due to some external dependencies (HDFS and Zookeeper). But its very much production ready for some epic data sets.
Re:The Apache Cassandra battle highlights major problem with...
by lacker on Sunday November 13, 2016 @08:55PM
(#12946991)
Facebook uses HBase pretty massively.
https://code.facebook.com/posts/321111638043166/hydrabase-th...
Take HBase... A thriving community, committers and PMC members from dozens of organizations, no open source vs commercial interest collisions.
Projects backed by a single commercial entity are suspect, but can work fine as well (Kafka for example).
Disclaimer: Apache HBase committer here.