News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Diamonds Suck (2006) by ajkjk on Sunday November 13, 2016 @01:40PM (#12944823)
It's definitely not just that, because placing huge import on diamonds, and gushing over their (much agreed upon) beauty, and having preferences for stones and cuts etc., and showing them off at the office, and talking about their size and how much they must have cost, and equating some of those things with the size of someone's affection and worth as a person, are still ubiquitous in (at least) American society.

As far as I can tell they're only on the way out with bleeding-edge progressives.

Re:Diamonds Suck (2006) by Moshe_Silnorin on Sunday November 13, 2016 @01:43PM (#12944840)
>As far as I can tell they're only on the way out with bleeding-edge progressives.

A demographic known for their immunity to costly signalling behaviors.

Re:Diamonds Suck (2006) by hueving on Sunday November 13, 2016 @04:17PM (#12945726)
Which is why the Tesla model S is so wildly unpopular in the bay area.
Re:Diamonds Suck (2006) by findjashua on Tuesday November 15, 2016 @04:13PM (#12962277)
Totally. It doesn't serve any purpose other than signaling status, can't imagine what else anyone could possibly like about it. /s
Re:Diamonds Suck (2006) by ajkjk on Sunday November 13, 2016 @03:58PM (#12945628)
Just trying to work in a jab against that group?