Why Mark Suster is wrong about not hiring job hoppers

Re:Why Mark Suster is wrong about not hiring job hoppers by kanwisher on Sunday April 25, 2010 @12:21PM (#1292945)

I think loyalty is something earned. I think we should model jobs more like relationships, value has to be given on each side of the equation. If your not treating the girl well, she leaves. You don't go in saying, baby if you date me you have to be here for the next 2 years even if I start beating you.

disclaimer I'm a Job hopper ;)

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Why Mark Suster is wrong about not hiring job hoppers by ulrich on Sunday April 25, 2010 @01:42PM (#1293105)

But a girl who has been changing boyfriends like her clothes in the past is more likely to do so in the future. Maybe that's because she doesn't fullfill her side of the equation in general.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Why Mark Suster is wrong about not hiring job hoppers by mattm on Sunday April 25, 2010 @03:18PM (#1293320)

Wouldn't it still be worth it to be with a great girl for only a few months?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Why Mark Suster is wrong about not hiring job hoppers by gigantosaurus on Sunday April 25, 2010 @07:44PM (#1293737)

I've heard similar advice about hiring people who are obviously over-qualified and will probably leave in 6 months. You have to use them not as workers, but as trainers and inspiration beacons for the rest of the team.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Why Mark Suster is wrong about not hiring job hoppers by varjag on Monday April 26, 2010 @07:39AM (#1294607)

The beacon that leaves after a few months? I don't know what kind of inspiration that would provide.

[ Parent | on HN ]