> Do you see any practical risk with someone offering a copied version of the extension
They're are already a bunch of extensions doing something similar for free. I like to think people have used my extension because I'm never more then an email away if they have any questions. Also as it's paid, I have no incentive to sell it to a 3rd party who might start injecting ads into webpages or something.
I find deliberate bait and switch distasteful. It will eventually breed an atmosphere of suspicion tainting the whole system.
(Nothing against an honest "Free for now, will see next year" right upfront)
The key question here is what percent of the potential purchasers already have a Chrome wallet (or whatever it's called now) and just have to click "buy".
Impulse purchases by these users would be more likely to drop off with a price increase.
Would you suggest to first make an extension available for free (in order to get a nice install-base) and then offer as an Annual Subscription?
Do you see any practical risk with someone offering a copied version of the extension (with different name) at a slightly lower cost?