Re:An SSD Endurance Experiment: They're All Dead (2015)
by Reason077 on Wednesday November 09, 2016 @08:58PM
(#12917019)
Replacing the SSDs every year might be a valid solution, too.
It may be far cheaper to do so than to spend developer time coming up with a ramdisk solution. And RAM is far more expensive, per GB, than SSDs.
Next year's drives will be cheaper and better, anyway.
Re:An SSD Endurance Experiment: They're All Dead (2015)
by konstmonst on Thursday November 10, 2016 @09:36AM
(#12920658)
There is no "solution" to speak of, tmpfs can be mounted on any directory on linux, so there is no difference to normal build process at least on linux. Also for example I can serialise build jobs in jenkins, so the total amount of space required will be spread over time.
Re:An SSD Endurance Experiment: They're All Dead (2015)
by imtringued on Thursday November 10, 2016 @02:42AM
(#12918492)
RAM is more expensive than SSDs but it's still very cheap at roughly $5 per GB. Higher density 32GB DIMMs cost only a bit more at $7 per GB. You can buy terabytes of RAM for a few thousand dollars.
Bandaid solutions (replace every x months, buy something bigger/faster, etc) are not the way to go. The hardware solution to this is not buy a high-endurance drive but to buy more RAM and set up a tmpfs build directory - or buy a ram drive and use that for build instead of you want to eliminate even that software configuration step.