News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Tech Startups vs Rock Bands by hexis on Saturday April 24, 2010 @02:56PM (#1291387)
The most important similarity between a musician with a major label contract and an a venture-backed entrepreneur is that both people have sold a piece of the business. "If all goes well", both people will be making money for someone else.

Never forget, MTV and Techcrunch are both the same kind of lie.

Re:Tech Startups vs Rock Bands by starkfist on Saturday April 24, 2010 @02:05PM (#1291289)
You missed "have sex with 4300 groupies" vs. "not have sex since that lucky break in college."
Re:Tech Startups vs Rock Bands by baguasquirrel on Saturday April 24, 2010 @04:57PM (#1291554)
It does seems hard to pick someone's brain, or pitch them your idea, while trying to lay them at the same time. Getting an honest opinion out of someone and swooning them seem to be mutually exclusive goals.
Re:Tech Startups vs Rock Bands by mkramlich on Saturday April 24, 2010 @07:00PM (#1291727)
So could we combine this observation with the investment process? You could, say, try f-cking a VC before they ever get a chance to f-ck you over! :)
Re:Tech Startups vs Rock Bands by wyclif on Saturday April 24, 2010 @10:48PM (#1292037)
The rock music parallel to the "lean" startup, and why you shouldn't go the VC (major label) route is "The Problem With Music" by Steve Albini:

http://www.negativland.com/albini.html

Re:Tech Startups vs Rock Bands by rythie on Saturday April 24, 2010 @04:58PM (#1291556)
I want my TechCrunch

Now look at them yo-yo's that's the way you do it

You get the site on the TechCrunch

That ain't workin' that's the way you do it

Money for nothin' and your conferences for free

(reference, in case you're too young to get it: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V5ZEzWwKJnY)