News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:A Formal Security Analysis of the Signal Messaging Protocol by throwanem on Tuesday November 08, 2016 @09:46AM (#12900614)
It has origin in 4chan, like a lot of memes, and is at least as insulting to its user as to its object - being in essence an insult directed at functional adults by caricatures of NEETs, the humor coming from the fact that the latter really aren't in a position to look down on the former.

Of course, as with any hot meme, it gets a semantic makeover in the course of widening adoption, but if you're looking for an answer to the question of whether someone who uses "normie" unironically, especially in a context outside Reddit or a *chan, merits taking seriously...well, at the very least, I think it's reasonable to interpret that at least as a strong clue that the user isn't in the habit of thoroughly considering his utterances before emitting them.

Re:A Formal Security Analysis of the Signal Messaging Protocol by sametmax on Tuesday November 08, 2016 @10:25AM (#12900936)
Ah ok. In the context of 4chan or memes, it's not a problem. You usually like them because of the politically incorrectness. It just seems out of place on HN, where people tends to be overly analytic, and rarely call people names.
Re:A Formal Security Analysis of the Signal Messaging Protocol by mst on Tuesday November 08, 2016 @11:04AM (#12901308)
In a conversation like this I read it as a short-hand for "average non-techical user" that's less directly insulting than "lusers". I'd probably just say "normal user" or "average user" myself, but I don't find it name-calling in context.
Re:A Formal Security Analysis of the Signal Messaging Protocol by throwanem on Tuesday November 08, 2016 @11:05AM (#12901318)
It is out of place on HN.