IAB Statement on IPv6

Re:IAB Statement on IPv6 by executesorder66 on Tuesday November 08, 2016 @07:10AM (#12899574)

I guess it's hobbyists who's normal internet connection is ipv4, but on the weekend they have time to dick around with ipv6 devices and connections.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:IAB Statement on IPv6 by selectodude on Tuesday November 08, 2016 @08:40AM (#12900100)

Comcast and Verizon Wireless rolled out IPv6 years ago, and resolves IPv6 addresses first by default. Nobody is dicking around, it's just transparent.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:IAB Statement on IPv6 by liotier on Tuesday November 08, 2016 @10:02AM (#12900733)

> Nobody is dicking around

Well, I am. Now let met enjoy my statistical insignificance !

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:IAB Statement on IPv6 by executesorder66 on Tuesday November 08, 2016 @09:32AM (#12900481)

How does that explain the massive spikes on weekends?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:IAB Statement on IPv6 by selectodude on Tuesday November 08, 2016 @09:56AM (#12900690)

People do more internet at home on weekends than they do on weekdays.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:IAB Statement on IPv6 by mSparks on Tuesday November 08, 2016 @07:51AM (#12899788)

possible i guess

do we see something similar with .onion addresses?

ive found it much more reliable and secure to give devices i want access to from anywhere a .onion address rather than a ipv6 one.

secure by design rather than plaintext insecure and only works on some internet connections occasionally by design nightmare that is ipv6.

[ Parent | on HN ]