The New York Times to Offer Open Access on Web and Apps for the Election

Re:The New York Times to Offer Open Access on Web and Apps f... by throwaway_nyt on Tuesday November 08, 2016 @06:37AM (#12899411)

Good thing, atleast you read this one before ignoring:- https://theintercept.com/2016/10/09/exclusive-new-email-leak...

Don't give me your attitude. I got one wrong and admit the mistake on that one. That does not really refute any other emails.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:The New York Times to Offer Open Access on Web and Apps f... by croon on Tuesday November 08, 2016 @09:36AM (#12900521)

> https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/4213#efmDVTDWd Mark Leibovich giving veto power on a clinton piece.

You got the second one wrong as well, so I stopped there instead. He was giving veto on what to use on off-the-record questions, which I hope you agree, is a very good practice.

Someone else can deal with your third, and fourth...

But if you want apples to apples, it's unfortunate that you can't dig through Trumps emails [1].

It's sad that politics is no longer about politics.

[1] http://europe.newsweek.com/donald-trump-companies-destroyed-...

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:The New York Times to Offer Open Access on Web and Apps f... by _fizz_buzz_ on Tuesday November 08, 2016 @07:14AM (#12899603)

> Don't give me your attitude.

You are right. I apologize for the dismissive tone of my comment.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:The New York Times to Offer Open Access on Web and Apps f... by Angostura on Tuesday November 08, 2016 @07:17AM (#12899620)

The trouble is, when you get the first one wrong, it doesn't encourage people to take the time to read the rest.

[ Parent | on HN ]