Re:New sandbox features in systemd
by wmf on Friday November 04, 2016 @07:08PM
(#12876979)
systemd is never going to work that way and it sounds like maybe you already know that so it borders on trolling to bring it up. This functionality is pretty straightforward so I'm not sure what the value of multiple competing implementations would be.
You can do something like ExecStart=bubblewrap foo, but that's a different syntax than systemd's native sandboxing.
You can do something like ExecStart=bubblewrap foo, but that's a different syntax than systemd's native sandboxing.