News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Docker in Production: A History of Failure. Parent comment

Re:Docker in Production: A History of Failure by deadbunny on Friday November 04, 2016 @06:17PM (#12876622)
Ah yes, ZFS the saviour.

Just as long as it does't get anywhere near capacity.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Docker in Production: A History of Failure by X86BSD on Friday November 04, 2016 @06:24PM (#12876687)
I assume you are referring to the same limitations almost every FS on earth to date suffers from when you consume about 90% capacity?

What a useless comment. If you are running out of capacity adding disks to a zpool is incredibly mind numbingly easy.

"zfs add poolname mirror disk1 disk2"

Every filesystem has performance hit the floor when you consume all available capacity. This is not unique to ZFS but to well, reality.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Docker in Production: A History of Failure by deadbunny on Friday November 04, 2016 @06:31PM (#12876731)
No I'm talking 100% capacity, shit happens and I do t want to fight the fs when it does.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Docker in Production: A History of Failure by Gigablah on Friday November 04, 2016 @08:35PM (#12877422)
100% is a lot better than ~80% (looking at you btrfs)
[ Parent | on HN ]