News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Dalai Lama: Behind Our Anxiety, the Fear of Being Unneeded by taurath on Friday November 04, 2016 @03:26PM (#12875245)
Think about how many more humans there are, and how unlikely one is to be a special snowflake. We can be special and needed by others - not to society. I don't think society will give us a role that we can emotionally engage with anymore and take pride in. The only way we can belong is to our relationships.
Re:Dalai Lama: Behind Our Anxiety, the Fear of Being Unneeded by rfugger on Friday November 04, 2016 @03:41PM (#12875398)
I agree with this, so I feel for the millions who are largely excluded from meaningful relationships because they have issues or are otherwise difficult or imperfect socially. And to be honest, who doesn't have issues or sometimes feel excluded? Or, more importantly, fear exclusion?

Social exclusion no longer means death for humans, but our brains are wired to feel that it does, and so there is an epidemic of loneliness, disconnection, and fear.

I'm not saying that the old days of completely depending on one's tribe of family and friends for survival was better in objective terms, but it was harmonious with our evolved instincts to be part of a small, mutually-connected group. Economic and social forces in a globalized society tend to act against the sustainability of such groups. So even those who are well-connected aren't as deeply connected, and are always threatened with potential loss of connection for unpredictable, uncontrollable economic or social reasons.

Re:Dalai Lama: Behind Our Anxiety, the Fear of Being Unneeded by steveax on Friday November 04, 2016 @09:25PM (#12877602)
Your post reminded me of the Fresh Air interview with Sebastian Junger a while back [1]. I've not read the book yet, but it's on my list.

[1]: http://www.npr.org/2016/05/21/478962909/sebastian-junger-s-e...

Re:Dalai Lama: Behind Our Anxiety, the Fear of Being Unneeded by reflexive on Friday November 04, 2016 @07:05PM (#12876958)
> We can be special and needed by others - not to society.

Only because "society" is too large. For millions of years, "society" meant the same as "others", who were a hundred or so folks in your particular band of primates. You could have a personal understanding with each one of them.

Now that "society" is 7 billion anonymous people, of course you don't matter in that context. Concepts like "universal brotherhood" make no sense, because meaning and belonging don't scale.