Re:Mozilla stops distribution of WOT addon
by cheiVia0 on Friday November 04, 2016 @02:32PM
(#12874796)
Mozilla actually manually reviews the extensions and updates to the extensions, and would reject obfuscated code. See for example:
https://blog.mozilla.org/addons/2016/08/19/a-simpler-add-on-...
https://blog.mozilla.org/addons/2010/02/15/the-add-on-review...
Re:Mozilla stops distribution of WOT addon
by paulryanrogers on Friday November 04, 2016 @02:17PM
(#12874688)
Serious question: do you audit code changes in browser updates?
EDIT: I realize there are (probably) fewer authors involved there.
Re:Mozilla stops distribution of WOT addon
by codedokode on Friday November 04, 2016 @05:42PM
(#12876404)
Browsers are made by reputable organizations like Mozilla Foundation or (not so reputable) Google. And extensions are usually written by some anonymous person from Internet (or sold to anonymous person after gaining popularity).
For example I don't use any browser extensions because I don't have time to inspect their code after every update.
I wonder why both Google and Mozilla don't write this at the front page of their extension stores?